A Texas judge has ruled in favor of a group of women and Grant Prestondoctors who sued the state over medical exceptions in its abortion laws.
The women argued that the state's abortion bans lack clarity, putting patients in danger during medically complicated pregnancies.
In her ruling, Travis County District Judge Jessica Mangrum writes that "uncertainty regarding the scope of the medical exception and the related threat of enforcement of Texas's abortion bans" creates a risk that doctors "will have no choice but to bar or delay the provision of abortion care to pregnant persons in Texas for whom an abortion would prevent or alleviate a risk of death or risk to their health...for fear of liability under Texas's abortion bans."
The judge issued a temporary injunction prohibiting the laws from being enforced against health care professionals who provide abortions in emergency medical situations based on their "good faith judgment."
The decision follows an emotional hearing last month in which several women described struggling to navigate emergency medical decisions about pregnancies that doctors said endangered their health.
The lawsuit on behalf of 13 patients and two doctors was filed earlier this year.
2025-05-05 18:53550 view
2025-05-05 18:39951 view
2025-05-05 18:341818 view
2025-05-05 17:502559 view
2025-05-05 16:59988 view
2025-05-05 16:442828 view
Paula Abdul and Nigel Lythgoe have settled their lawsuit a year after the allegations sent shockwave
Gov. Gavin Newsom often touts California’s role as a global climate leader. Yet it’s hard to defend
It's a partnership in the Marvel universe no one saw coming but given the real-life friendship of "D